<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejection Letters to Writers Mean Nothing, Expert Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janetshaw.com/blog/rejection-letters-to-writers-mean-nothing-expert-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janetshaw.com/blog/rejection-letters-to-writers-mean-nothing-expert-says/</link>
	<description>Australian Author &#38; Freelance Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McManus</title>
		<link>http://janetshaw.com/blog/rejection-letters-to-writers-mean-nothing-expert-says/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.janetshaw.com/blog/rejection-letters-to-writers-mean-nothing-expert-says/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I think most of my past rejection letters for articles were right, when I think back now. I do wish some of them had got somewhere, though. I&#039;ve never had a rejection letter for a book, though, and that&#039;s got to hurt if you take it personally. I suspect most submitted books are never read and rejection slips are just pro-forma responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of my past rejection letters for articles were right, when I think back now. I do wish some of them had got somewhere, though. I&#8217;ve never had a rejection letter for a book, though, and that&#8217;s got to hurt if you take it personally. I suspect most submitted books are never read and rejection slips are just pro-forma responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

